Skip to main content

Sow to the Spirit?


Galatians 6v8 Whoever sows to please their flesh, from the flesh will reap destruction; whoever sows to please the Spirit, from the Spirit will reap eternal life.
What does this mean?

In the final paragraphs of Paul's letter to his friends in Galatia what is he saying?
(a) Eternal life comes from good works?
(b) Or, something else.
Everything in Galatians says that option (a) can't be the case. You can't write for 5.5 chapters about how it's not what we contribute and then say it is. Context kills that, though sooo many commentators play that dischordant note.

Throughout the book two categories are established...
Faith / Spirit / Sonship vs. Flesh / Law / Slavery.
In chapter 5 those under the law will not inherit as they are slaves - their life will be marked by the works of the flesh. The works are an inevitable consequence not disqualifying acts. Likewise, those who live by the Spirit crucify the flesh and the Spirit produces fruit. But fleshly acts aren't disqualifying, and neither is there to be assurance in Spirit-fruit.

In Galatians what we do isn't where assurance is found. The whole book is designed to get the Galatians looking outside themselves to Christ as the way they get righteous, he who gives the only true ethnic marker of God's people - The Spirit.

Surely then, sowing to the flesh is to put yourself under law, whereas to sow to the Spirit is to believe the gospel. Fruit, to some degree, will follow but the believer's boast is the cross not the self and what we have or have not done - none of these things are anything, only new creation counts - what God has done by his gospel word.

The life I now live, isn't my life - it's only faith in the Son.

Which means...

  • The Christian faith is gospel not just ABC but A-Z (Galatians 3:1-5) - the Christian life is our union with Christ, hearing the gospel word with faith.
  • The Christian community can be honest about sin (Galatians 6:1-3) - the presence of sin isn't disqualifying, only the absence of the gospel, and our absenting ourselves from the Father who revealed his loving Son (1:6-9, 1:16) who gave himself for us (2:20). We are more sinful than we even know, but the gospel is sweeter than we can imagine. Imagine the freedom to stop striving, to stop faking and hiding, that's sonship.
  • Don't worry - not saying sinning is ok. Set your eyes on the cross and you're looking at the place where flesh is put to death and life in Christ is offered - no better place to convict of sin, no richer place to have your heart changed - to enter the battle between the old habits of the flesh, and the your new life as an adopted son in God's family.
We reap what we so, or much more: we reap what he sowed, watered and grew for us. No person is too good for that, no person too bad, no one has the wrong ethnicity or history. The gospel really does say, in Jesus' name: you are always welcome.

Image - Creative Commons - .martin.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…