Skip to main content

Christ and his Church in the Book of Psalms (Andrew Bonar)

I'm enjoying reading Andrew Bonar's book on the Psalms. I came across Bonar a few years back when Tim Chester was blogging from Bonar's excellent Leviticus commentary - a book that really draws the gospel out of a book that intimidates Christians more than most! Both are freely available from Google Books which is great.

In his notes on Psalms Bonar demonstrates the importance of reading them "with your left eye on David and your right eye fully on Christ." Much like the Song of Songs this is a 'both/and' book.... though Scripture is always firstly about Christ, and only then applicable to us in Christ. Psalms are beloved for speaking to the human condition but they do more - they sing of the gospel (which of course makes them deeply applicable to all!).

As Augustine said, "the voice of Christ and his Church was well nigh the only voice to be heard in the Psalms... Everywhere diffused throught is that man whose Head is above, and whose members are below" Bonar says: "we ought to recognise his voice in all the Psalms, either waking up the psaltery or uttering the deep groand - rejoicing in hope or heaving sights over present realities." And Tertullian says we see the person of Christ in all the Psalms.
Here's a couple of examples from Bonar:
On Psalm 27 (p94 - pdf 109): "the Righteous One's confident assertion of safety when lonely amid surrounding foes" 
"To see the Lord, in his temple where everything spoke of redemption, - there to see the Father's beauty, was the essence of his soul's desire. This "beauty" is the Lord's well-pleased look; such a look as the Father have, when his voice proclaimed, "this is my beloved Son, in whom I am well-pleased". It also means, all that makes God an object of affection and delight to a soul. Nothing could be more desirable to Christ than this approving look of his Father, teling, as it did, his love to the uttermost. And nothing to us sinners, can equal this look of love; it is the essence of heaven now, and heaven for ever. It is the "one thing;" for from this holy love proceed all other blessings. to catch glimpses of this "beauty" in the temple was our Lord's aim; he engaged in no other pursuit of earth. Neither did David..."

And on Psalm 63, which he calls "the righteous One finding water-springs in God":
"A Psalm for David - a Psalm for David's Son - A Psalm for the Church in every age - a Psalm for every member of the Church in the weary land! What assurance, what vehement desire, what soul-filling delight in God, in God alone - in God the only fountain of living water amid a boundless wilderness....  And when we read all this as spoken of Christ, how much does every verse become enhanced. His thirst for God! His vision of God! His estimate of God's loving-kindness! His soul satisfied! His mouth full of praise! His soul following hard after God!... And when verse 7 shews us the soul under the shadow of God's wings, rejocing, we may say, it is not only like as "the bird sheltered from the heat of the sun amid the rich foliage sings its merry note," but it is the soul reposing there as if entering the cloud of glory, like Moses and Elias"
I look forward to more reading from Bonar, and others who've gone before us, as I prepared to preach on one of the Psalms later this summer.


  1. As a general hermeneutical point, am I allowed to be a little bit controversial here and say that one eye on David and another on Christ, exalts David too highly? I'm probably jumping around on a minefield here, as I don't have any theological qualifications to my name, but I say this for two reasons...

    1. Peter (Acts 2:29-30) and Jesus (Matt.22:43-44) clearly state that David wasn't talking about himself or his life experience / worldly circumstances, but speaking prophetically. I realise that you can't apply that to all his Psalms, e.g. 51, but my hunch is that it can be applied more than it is.

    2. What makes me nervous about the "understand the context first, then move to Christological typology" method is the assumption that the story has inherent meaning / value outside of Christ, that David reveals Christ, rather than turning that on its head and saying that in Christ are all the treasures of wisdom and knowledge and that David's life (and indeed all of our lives), only makes sense and has meaning as it points to the Christ event.

  2. How refreshing!

    And how rare today for anyone to have such a concern, in such left-eyed days! More please!

    Bonar is thankfully very right-eyed though he gives consideration to the left, trusting that in Christ we can appropriate Psalms as his church.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use ( tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue

2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin

3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong

4. Cornerstone - Hillsong

Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…