Skip to main content

Is Trinity just a System you're imposing on God?

Something has changed in my thinking in the last few years. Trinity has moved from p226 of Systematic Theology (as in Grudem) to having to be on page 1.
Am I just imposing a system?
Yes, but I had a system before. The question is, is my system Biblical or not? Everyone is a theologian, the question is am I a good theologian or a rubbish theologian. The same applies to atheists and their atheology.


As I've got into church history I've been humbled to find that my old approach was shaped by a lot of philosophical thinking that seems to persist in the church, the legacy of the Aristotle-shaped Aquinas and others. This meant my view of 'God' was a being with attributes rather than one who makes himself known to us personally.

In this I was prone to an error of Arius who considered God firstly as the 'unoriginate'. Arius would pray "O God, the Everlasting God, Uncreated One, always the same..." but Jesus taught us to pray to his Father and our's, as "Our Father in heaven" a daddy prayer taught by the one who came down to find us to bring us back. Athanasius addresses this and reminds us that the place we come to know God is in the person of Jesus who comes to us as the Son, who has a Father. Here God is not the divine law-giver, the decree-maker, the powerful-creator or the block-of-concrete who rules and never changes, but the Father who is well pleased with his beloved Son. Here Christianity is going to be all about Christ.

This approach means my 'system' is centred upon the gospel, and cashes out with God who is personal, and whom I know firstly as the Father who sent his Son to the cross to bring me, with the rest of his people, into relationship with him, in his renewed creation. It's this gospel-dynamic that then shapes everything else. This is warmer and bigger than the alternative angle which tends to sound more like a Jehovah's Witness, High Church, Islamic approach to thinking about a god who is distant and impersonal - and ends up being individualistic religion rather than life in community with God and people. The God of the Bible is the one who we live to know, to find our life in his sheer love for us  - the God who is the loving Father with a beautiful Son who sends the person of the Holy Spirit to live within us.

Comments

  1. Hi Dave, this link http://www.kouya.net/?p=3373 will take you to a couple of posts that look at the issue of the Trinity and Systematics. One is lifted from another blog and the other is a book review. Hope they help.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is good. I've made the same journey... probably over the last two years, slightly later than you. It may seem like nitpicking to some, but I think it's been part of a bunch of small shifts in thinking that have made a big difference for the better in my life lately.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…