Skip to main content

The Gospel in Esther (1) The Scandal of the Bride in the Royal Garden

WE HATE AUTHORITY AND ASSUME FEMINISM. In the 21st Century west when we read Esther 1 we almost automatically see a despotic king abusing his wife by trying to parade her in front of his guests having had a few drinks. We have an inherent distaste for authority and an assumed feminism that makes the scene unbearable when a powerful king calls and exiles his wife and seeks a new one.

What if that's not what's going on? 

Picture instead the king as a positive figure.
This man is the king of the whole world from India to Ethiopia, nothing happens outside his domain. Having overcome the chaos at the start of his reign he sits down in the third year. Victorious, as is expected of the great kings in the third year/day. He holds a great feast in his house for his people. The king is glad, delighting in his people and his kingdom, overflowing in abundant blessing. He holds two further feasts in his royal gardens. The scene is deeply colourful and reminiscent of Eden's garden and the tabernacle, where there is much food and drink to be consumed without paying for it.

On the seventh day of the feast, on the day of rest, in the garden, he invites his wife to come. Every man knows that his bride his is glory and his crown (just as the churches were to Paul, and the church is to Christ). He longs to display her beauty so that all may see how magnificent she is. Why would she refuse him? He's telling the world of his love - she is his "better half" - he wants everyone to know and see her. If when you came to my house I kept my wife hidden and refused to introduce you to her that would be awful - my love for her is magnified in my desire to have you meet her, to see how brilliant she is.

Yet, she rejects his word, refuses to come into his presence, scorning him in the garden on the seventh day. Seeking counsel he concludes that she must be exiled from his presence. His love producing jealous anger that drives her way forever. Yet, the king is now without a bride - and this he remembers (zakar-melek, 2:1) just as the LORD remembered (zakar-jah) his people in their exile in Egypt, and so the king begins search begins for a new bride upon whom he can lavish his covenantal love (chesed, 2:18).

What appears at first intolerable is a real-life parable of the gospel story. The Scriptures give us narrative, and teaching, poetry and literary accounts of subplots that test our hearts and give flashes of insight into the bigger story. Perhaps Esther functions this way as a book, even in these opening events...


  1. Thanks for that, I'd never read the passage that way before. How do you think we should decide which interpretation of the passage is correct? I'm assuming you think the positive interpretation of the king is correct - why is that your view, and how confident do you think we can be about it being correct?


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use ( tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue

2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin

3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong

4. Cornerstone - Hillsong

Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…