Skip to main content

Can charismatics and non-charismatics live together?

Can charismatics and non-charismatics live together? Yes. Of course. And they do. But how? So here's some theory, it's a stereotyped and simplified and it's not my idea.  They are scribbles from a morning with Mark Bonnington. Among evangelicals we find charismatics and non-charismatics. The charismatics may perceive non-charismatics as being "word" people while the charismatic is perceived to emphasis "word" and "spirit". It's a broad-brushstroke but observable enough.

Charismatic Christianity is a fact of Christianity today (probably globally the majority?), as is non-charismatic Christianity.

The distinctives of charismatic Christianity are an emphasis on experience and exercising the full range of spiritual gifts today. These aren't necessarily exclusive to charismatics, for example many non-charismatics sharing the puritan emphasis on affections, but you won't find charismatics who lack these two emphases. That's not to say those things define them - just look at the endorsements on Pierced for our Transgressions to see that it's the cross that we hold in common. Cross-centredness is an evangelical distinctive, not a distinctive when we contrast the charismatic and the non-charismatic believer.

Bonnington argues that to some extent the shape of our Christianity depends on our integrating points. I've heard people suggest that personality plays a big part (y'know introverted non-charismatics, extroverted charismatics - if so I'm something of an exception as an introverted charismatic, along with a lot of others I can think of!) but it's the Bible that drives all good-hearted believers. We all want to be 66-book Christians but we inevitably have favourite points which end up carrying more weight for us.

So take cover and view some stereotypes! 

The non-charismatic might turn most to Romans to draw their Christianity together - this is to stereotype a propositional and doctrinal focus. Doctrine and propositions are things to die for.

But, three types of charismatics might take a different emphasis. Some turn to 1 Cor 12-14 and major on the importance of gifts in the body of the local church. Some turn to Luke-Acts expecting signs and wonders and power for mission with a high value on baptism in the Spirit. Some turn to Matthew-Mark-Luke and look for Jesus-style kingdom ministry with much healing, intimacy and the like.

I'd argue all four belong in evangelicalism but when they try to live together things can be a bit tense, because discipleship, ministry, evangelism might begin to look really different depending where you're coming from. Somehow we need to work it out. We can't just say, do it on my terms (and leave your distinctives at the door) so we need a way to live together, celebrating one another's approaches and learning from them. Taking the best from each other, recognising that we have differences, not sweeping them away or saying they don't matter - developing robust enough fellowship that we can actually disagree and still love one another and work with one another. Understanding those who emphasise some things differently and realising that we can learn from them and work with them is a beginning.


  1. Although not all charismatics are evangelical either. I know plenty of liberal and catholic charismatics.

    And there is quite a difference between different streams, especially between the pentecostal and the charismatic.

  2. True - I guess for the purposes of the unity question I was limiting to just the evangelical ones! The range within charismatic/pentecostal theology is big - and certainly spans liberal/catholic divides.

    It's funny really cos my first church was somewhere on the vineyardy end of the spectrum with pentecostal elements - influenced heavily by Toronto - so a big focus on intimacy with God.... and then I grew to see the more traditional pentecostal "power for mission" side of things, mostly through my early days with UCCF, and then in the last couple of years I've landed within newfrontiers which has some of the above and then very strong "Gifts to grow the church" focus too. I suspect I've really been on the same page as newfrontiers for about the last eight years or so.

    Bonnington makes positive observations about the affinity charismatics feel for one another despite their other differences.

  3. To make it even more complicated, not all evangelicals are evangelical either! ;)

  4. Pete you are quite right. Some of them are Calvinists! ;-)

    Dave, the influence of renewal is remarkably wide with very different understandings of body ministry and how the spirit works. Much like understandings of how Christ is present in the sacraments. Personally (as an Anglican / Reformed Catholic) I tend towards movements which are strongly sacramental and charismatic.

    Which is why I always had a soft spot for Wesley, some Pentecostals and never quite fitted with New Frontiers!

    I do remember a joint adult baptism with two churches, one where the pastor stood up and said 'this is just a symbol', then at the next baptism the other pastor stood up and said 'this is more than just a symbol'.

    With NFI seemingly embracing threefold order (ordination?) of Apostles, Presbyters, Deacons, I wonder where they stand these days on wider sacramental span from baptism to the Lord's Supper.

  5. I'd think it's one of those issues on which you'd find a range of views, as with any movement. Recently heard someone describe something as "That was very Anglican" which could mean just about anything positively or negatively.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use ( tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue

2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin

3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong

4. Cornerstone - Hillsong

Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…