Skip to main content

We all have our creation stories (Glen Scrivener)

Yesterday I was pondering a five part evangelistic series from the start of Genesis, more on that later/soon. 

Glen Scrivener cites Brian Cox:
"Every civilization has its own creation story": The ancient Chinese, indian mystics and Christian theologians all place a divine creator at the heart of their creation stories. Science too has an elaborate story that describes the universe’s genesis. It tells us how the fundamental constituents of the cosmos took on their form. The difference with this story is that we can test it. We can find out if its true by tearing matter apart and looking at the pieces. All you need is a machine powerful enough to restage the first moments after creation… 
Glen then responds:
The Christian story looks very different. This is because time and chance are not the main players in this story. The Christian story begins with a purposeful Creator Father who makes all things in and through and for His Son, Jesus, in the power of His eternal Spirit. Already you can see that the Christian’s story of the world will be very different...
Go read more.

Comments

  1. An excellent, excellent article/poist, but it has a signigicant and fatal flaw.

    He sets up faith as opposite of facts in last sentence. No wonder Dawkins is confused

    ReplyDelete
  2. Tom, that sentence does not oppose faith and facts. The whole sentence was, "Don't let anyone tell you that science is a matter of fact not faith..." - that is, this is a common myth and perception, that people say fact and faith are distinct and at odds, and ally science with fact; and from this article, you should have seen how wrong-headed that assertion is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. oh...
    hi...
    yeah...
    what Rosemary said...

    ReplyDelete
  4. I didn't read it as opposed but rather as showing that both are faith positions... I like the CS Lewis distinction between 'Evolution' and the 'Myth of Evolution' which aren't the same thing at all, but often get confused. Lewis doesn't contend with the "science" which is sort of separate from the worldview question.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bish,
    That is kinda what I'm getting at. If the word "faith" in common parlance means "without facts" then, conceding that we are a "without facts position" in order to say, "so is scientific naturalism" is too great a cost to pay, theologically and philosophically.
    I think that the same point can be made by replacing the word "faith" with "basic beliefs", but that doesn't compound the misconception.
    Did I say that I loved the article?

    ReplyDelete
  6. You did, before you said fatally flawed! I agree it'd probably be better for us to drop use of faith than to show that others have it too...

    Happy interactions.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Just thought it was interesting to hear a 'we simply deal in the objective realm of pure facts' guy saying 'we're telling a story, just like everyone else.'

    And to push that thought one step further: 'Scientists aren't the only ones who can test hypotheses (and therefore establish 'facts') The Christian story also has facts that are testable according to its own frame of reference.'

    And so the punchline is: theology is a science. Indeed, Queen of the sciences.

    Tom, if you've read me as saying 'faith is opposed to facts' then I'll have to do a lot better at communicating these thoughts in the future.

    Now I can imagine the kind of Christian apologist who might not like my post. There are evidentialists who want to buy into the scientists' own delusion that we can deal in "pure fact" without recourse to an interpretive framework. I can see how they would object to the post. They just won't buy my 'everyone's got a story' story. But if we can agree that all facts need interpreting I don't see the problem.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…