Skip to main content

Preaching training should include watching The West Wing

Josh Harris highlights an article on the value of the teleprompter: "When it comes to rhetoric, winging it is often shoddy and self-indulgent -- practiced by politicians who hear Mozart in their own voices while others perceive random cymbals and kazoos. Leaders who prefer to speak from the top of their heads are not more authentic, they are often more shallow -- not more "real," but more undisciplined."

I'm all for speaking without a script, but often we think it means less preparation instead of more to be able to do that. I'm all for a preacher using an outline (so long as it's one that actually makes sense) but if that's not derived from careful consideration of language, of arguments, of memorable ways of saying things then much preaching is only going to be shallow reality.

If Toby Ziegler, Sam Seaborn and Will Bailey watch every word that should be in President Bartlet's mouth, how much more should the preacher who opens his mouth to publicly portray Christ as crucified make every word count. You could start almost anywhere but season 4's double episode on the Inauguration is as good a place as any. That's not to say the preacher's character and accurate exegesis don't matter - they're non-negotiables. But adding genuine crafting of language wouldn't be a bad move, one finds it Biblically advocated in Ecclesiastes 12  and illustrated in the preceeding chapters, and we find it in the stunning language, argument and structure of Stephen's martyr-worthy sermon, Peter's Christ-exalting Pentecostal-preaching and in the parables and teachings of Jesus. I ♥ good words and good words take time.


  1. Given that all of the above is true...

    There's a limit. Say a pastor can prep a faithful, clear, weekly sermon in 6 hours, but then decides he should refine his talk to the oratorical standards of the greats... well, it could easily take double, even triple time. Some of it may be useful but those hours might well have been better used another way.

  2. .....any excuse to watch more West Wing eh?
    "Come to our preaching training session, where we will watch a really helpful training DVD..."

    Erm ...I'd come.

    Paul's comment above is helpful though. There is a danger that we drift into wanting to have perfect oratory with all the pazzazz in delivery. I think thats something we have unwittingly bought into in our preaching. Its what drives us at times to join in the cult of Christian celebrity whether as fans or wannabees. Much as I love to hear great talks too, there is a risk that it is about the oratory as much as the content.

    None of this denies Josh H's main point though, that 'off the cuff = more authentic' is silly. That often is laziness and sloppiness.

  3. True enough, its not that we have to use rhetorical tricks, nor that a pastor should spend all his time doing it - merely a small part of leadership development,...

    ...or it's West Wing addiction seeking to justify itself.

  4. Bish,

    I see your challenge and I like it.

    Do you think that the mastery of phrase, word and sentence is a kind of art? We have other forms of art - music, songwriting, and err..... cooking??

    I'm sure that you would agree that the way that Toby and Sam construct great speeches isn't just linguistic. It is at least 50% logical.

    Jesus is a logical artisan.

  5. I think this is a fantastic idea. I agree that artistry and good vocabluary can make a big difference - especially in certain contexts.

    I wonder if there are any church buildings which have teleprompters installed, or pastors who enlist the help of volunteer speech-writers to flesh out / refine their sermon outlines. I guess there is no reason why sermon preparation cannot be more of a team enterprize?

  6. I've just bought the boxed set of The West Wing to test your theory ;-)

  7. Tom: I do think it's a kind of art. Some have it instinctively but even then it takes work to master. Logic is clearly part of it. You can use all the nice words you like but it gets you no where substantial if they don't make sense.

    Martin: Always knew you were a godly man.

    Stanton: I've found myself coaching a number of preachers in recent months, and sometimes we have to work the exegesis, sometimes the structure and argument, and on a number of occasions it's been a pleasure to have the time to just work on making the language clearer and more piercing.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use ( tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue

2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin

3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong

4. Cornerstone - Hillsong

Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…