Skip to main content

CS Lewis: When Cabbages teach Botany, or The Interrogation of Futility

We left CS Lewis (in De Futilitate) concluding that the way forward with futility wasn't to just take it, or to deny it, but to face it head on.

We feel a sense of cosmic futility.
Futility is the opposite of utility.
"In calling it futile we are only expressing our naive surprise at the discovery that basic reality does not possess the characteristics of a human artefact — a thing made by men to serve the purposes of men — and the demand that it should -may be regarded as preposterous"
The universe fails to serve us and thus we conclude "futile!" - yet who are we to have supposed it should serve us, small us in our small corner of the Universe. Furthermore
"The proper way of stating the facts is not to say that the universe is futile, but that the universe has produced an animal, namely man, which can make deeply engrained that even when the creature is not engaged in tool-making it continues to use this pattern of thought...Hence arises the absurd practice of demanding that the universe should be ‘good’ complaining that it is bad’."
The futile universe produced us who ask the question. Asking tells us about us but not a great deal about the universe. We have to ask whether our own thinking is as futile as the futility we observe, but one cannot pursue that line of argument for very long. We have to conclude that some insights are actually true. We do this about science, though we're reluctant to say the same morally. So,
"That is why in modern stories of what the Americans call science fiction - stories about unknown species who inhabit other planets or the depth of the sea - these creatures are usually pictured as being wholly devoid of our moral standards but as accepting our scientific standards."
But it's a false distinction. The only distinction really is between logical and non-logical thought, our knowledge comes from sensible inference. From which Lewis concludes:
"logic is a real insight into the way in which real things have to exist. In other words, the laws of thought are also the laws of things: of things in the remotest space and the remotest time . This admission seems to me completely unavoidable and it has very momentous consequences."
This is explored further in his book Miracles (chapters 1-6). From here we find a purely material account of the universe to be ruled out.
"The laws whereby logic obliges us to think turn out to be the laws according to which every event in space and time must happen. The man who thinks this an ordinary or probable result does not really understand. It is as if cabbages, in addition to resulting from the laws of botany also gave lectures in that subject: or as if, when I knocked out my pipe, the ashes arranged themselves into letters which read: ‘We are the ashes of a knocked-out pipe.’ But if the validity of knowledge cannot be explained in that way, and if perpetual happy coincidence throughout the whole of recorded time is out of the question, then surely we must seek the real explanation elsewhere."
However reality can be logical and still disregard any recognisable values and so be accused of futility. Yet, the accusation implies a standard. Thus the "Heroic anti-theism thus has a contradiction in its centre." (anti-theism rather than atheism feels more appropriate for our present age - the so called New Atheists don't just deny God they seem to rage against him) - Identifying and taking issue with the futility undermines our accusations. And so:
"Our sense that the universe is futile and our sense of a duty to make those parts of it we can reach less futile, both really imply a belief that it is not in fact futile at all: a belief that values are rooted in reality outside ourselves, that the Reason in which the universe is saturated is also moral."
To be continued...


  1. Maybe my eyes are going but CS Lewis looks a lot like Jack Bauer in these photos...

  2. Your eyes fail you, it's Jack Lewis.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use ( tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue

2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin

3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong

4. Cornerstone - Hillsong

Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…