Skip to main content

Genesis 2: The Man and his Bride in the Global Garden

There is a problem when we read Genesis 2. Not with what's there, but with us. There are lies in the air that say we can't take this as God's word, we shouldn't trust it, it's not going to fit with the rest of the Bible. Thing is - it is God speaking, we can trust it and it does fit.

We find a wilderness. A barren world. And in that God plants a garden in which he puts The Man he made. All of this enacting not a 'Plan A' that's going to be messed up in chapter 3, but implementing the plan he made before the creation of the world to save a people for himself, by grace through his promise through the blood of Jesus. The man is put in the garden by the LORD (the covenant God) to work and keep it (serving like a priest in a temple... mediating God's image to the world... ruling the earth from the garden...).

From the garden flow rivers. This is a mountain. A mountain like the other mountain where 'you shall not...' is said - except this moutain has the Gihon flowing from it so might just be more like the mountain where King Hezekiah blocked up that river (Jerusalem... 2 Cor 32v30) and the one where angels will soon be guarding the east gate. Think temple mount more than Sinai.

From this garden he's to fill the earth - to extend the garden into a global garden, so that the earth will be full of people, bearing God's image and ruling the world. This is the king who is son of The King the garden God gave him. Except, he has no woman so he can't fill the earth. Something is not good - the plan can't be fulfilled. He's shown all the animals by God, who knows they won't be the helper he needs - and he rules them by naming them. Then God makes the woman from The Man, and he speaks his first recorded words (though probably "That's a Duckbilled Platypus" was he first phrase).

Now they can fill the world - joined in marriage, one flesh without shame. Marriage looks glorious and wonderful - and yet far removed from the 'normal' experience on earth. The original readers hear of an abundant garden of life, with a comission to fill the world from it. Yet, they live in the wilderness - surely they ask "why are we not already in the global garden? What has happened...." and they should say, let's press on into the land where there is rest and a land flowing with life. Sin needs an answer, and in Genesis 2 that's not yet obvious...  though it soon will be. How will the experienced strife of marriage be answered - and where did it come from?

Moreover, we know that The Man and his bride is really a picture of Christ and the church (Ephesians 5) a mystery that will be, and has now been revealed. For the real story of God's salvation awaits The Man who will die for his bride, shedding his blood for her sins. Reading Genesis 2 makes us hunger to be in the garden with The Man and his bride. The Second Adam, the True Man and his bride. To be found 'in' the church. In the global eden, that will be a temple-city, where we will live with Christ without shame.

Comments

  1. i like the way you're playing here. reminds me of lewis' prerelandra. I'd be interested in your playing with the ideas of 'outside the garden' before the fall - people hardly ever make any distinction. I think it's huge.

    Like the king-temple note (cf the man-king of Psalm 8), and once mankind fails, things only happen for humanity through solomon's temple (cf Gospel & Wisdom on 1 kings 4)

    ps although the rivers dont meet any more, I'd always thought daniel 8-10 were striking - when we return to the Eden rivers, it's godless, it's foreign, it's exile, in Babylon, of the Chaldees...maybe it picks up both temple & exile?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pre-fall the wilderness is what it is before - unformed earth I think.

    Post-fall it gets to be formed by man who has to start with dust.

    Without the fall it would have been cultivated, presumably along the rivers as the garden was extended to go global. That would have been easier than working the unformed dust and its thorns.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…