Skip to main content

FORUM - John Piper on Ruth 3, all about taking refuge under the wings of God

This morning we considered Strategic Righteousness in Chapter 3, exercise by the plans of Naomi, Ruth and Boaz. Naomi's skies begin to open. John Piper shared how we've been inspired by William Cowper (and his song God moves...) who could write of hope despite never really breaking free of the shadows of depression, cared for by John Newton.

He also shared from the darkest days at his church, in 1993, where the church lost members due to a hard decision he'd had to made, that took several years to recover from.

We were charged to plan righteous activity for the term. Hopeless people can't and don't plan, because they can't see ahead. We can dream when we have hope. Naomi's hope is evidently coming back as she plans for Ruth to go to Naomi. The hope shows that this isn't a loose woman and her coniving mother-in-law.

The key issue is what does the word 'garment' or 'skirt' mean. Piper argued from Ezekiel 16v8 that it's about the covenant wings of God under which his people find refuge. The ESV makes this plain, and points us back to the same word in chapter 2. I've loved Piper's rigorous argument built on verses not "logic", that has been warm, simple, accessible and compelling.

The language of Ruth, apparently unprompted, speaking to Boaz is covenant language. This is a noble relationship. He could drive her out or sleep with her, but says WAIT and he'll sort it in the morning. Then we're appalled - there is someone nearer than Boaz who could marry Ruth. We scream (with Piper) - Oh No!

We've gone into the drama of the book, we've gone to the heart of God, with tenderness and compassion in the darkest of days and found hope in a story that moves unstoppably to the rescuing of Ruth and the coming of David and Jesus. We conclude the book of Ruth tomorrow morning.

Comments

  1. Good stuff! Really wishing I was there!

    This raised my eyebrows...

    "I've loved Piper's rigorous argument, built on verses not logic, that has been warm, simple, accessible and compelling."

    I think I know what you mean, but logic isn't the right word. I think you mean not put in philosophical or theological jargon, rather than logic.

    I would be very very very concerned if you think that verses and logic could be split apart.

    ReplyDelete
  2. maybe that's better language... i figured saying it was rigorous argument but not logic was a way to express that.

    Various readers had wondered where the Price hobby horse had been. I'll let them know you're back. :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. That's very kind of you. Trust me, there are more important things in life than logic. But I do believe that most Christians have a big misunderstanding of what it is, and don't understand how to use a good gift that God made for us, and Jesus used all the time.

    See my post Jesus the Logician and the article I've linked to. http://abetterhope.blogspot.com/2008/02/jesus-logician.html

    I think you'll find that some of the most persuasive arguments are warm, simple, accessible and compelling. When you understand what logic really is you begin to 'get it' and see that arguments and logic are the very fabric of reality. Anyone who tries to reject that, has to use some kind of logic or argument to do so, and only ends up with a self-contradictory posture.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree. Thanks for supplying some helpful language.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with you, and as a mathmo I love musing on how Jesus is our Logic - anything claiming to be rational yet out of harmony with him is perverted logic. I seem to remember Piper making a 'verses vs. logic' point in a sermon I heard of his - Hebrews or Romans probably - in response to ppl accusing him of building his theology of logical inferences "rather than" explicitly from Scripture. He used the 'that's not logic: it's verses!' wording to point out how we see these things clearly in Scripture, but it's not a helpful contrast. Thankfully he also teaches strongly the need for rigourous argumentation and use of good logic - I suspect he was partly taking the michael out of the 'logic vs. verses' ppl, in borrowing their distinction and showing it to be rubbish.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…