Skip to main content

At a wedding, on the third day

One of the elements in the marriage service that bugs me (alongside the common usage of 1 Corinthians 13) is where marriage is said to be endorsed by God because Jesus attended a wedding (when God's invention of it in Genesis 2 is surely enough?). Anyone who reads the gospels knows that Jesus going somewhere is not an endorsement of it.

Anyway, I was reading the start of John recently and pondering...

In John 1 we see Jesus annointed by the Spirit and John the Baptist saying Jesus is the lamb. King's get annointed, lamb's die. Early on we know where this story is going. At the end of John 2 he says that Nathanael will see angels descending and ascending on the Son of Man which has got to be an allusion to Jacob's dream in which he sees a stairway to heaven (Genesis 28) - at Bethel, 'the house of God'. Jesus is that way! A King who dies who will be the way to heaven.

And then we're told that Jesus is at a wedding. Except it's not his - he's asked to do the groom's duty of providing wine and does 'as his first sign' but this isn't supposed to be his wedding. That will come later, but who will be his bride? The event happens on the third day (2:1) which is always worth noting. The King will die, be the way to God and will have a marriage where the wine flows (Isaiah 25v6 etc), that is connected to the third day.

Next, Jesus goes to the temple to talk about destroying and rebuilding it in three days... which John notes was Jesus talking about the resurrection though they didn't realise it at the time. But, Jesus is the house of God. He is the place God's people will meet with God. He's the king, who will die, who is the way to God, who will have a marriage and will rise from the dead. John says, see Jesus and believe that he's the way to abundant eternal life.

Comments

  1. I think the idea of endorsement flows, not from Jesus' attendance but it being Jesus' first public act of ministry. And it's not altogether unreasonable to see some significance in that. And it might be worth saying that if you want to be modelling good Hermeneutics, then you should be looking at the OT (Gen 2) through the lens of Jesus too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm not saying there is no significance, but rather that marriage gets it's support very strongly from Genesis 2 and Ephesians 5. Do explain what you mean by looking at Gen 2 through the lens of Jesus.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It isn't Jesus wedding, but it kinda indicates that Jesus is THE groom. After all, the succeeds where the groom failed. I suspect this is parabolic in John's mind of Jesus' relation to fruitless israel (he is after all, the true vine, being/doing what Israel was supposed to be/do but miserably failed).

    And, marriage is valid because Jesus is THE groom. It's what marriage is ultimately about (hence no marriage, except to Jesus, in the new creation).

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…