Skip to main content

Loving the church

Pyromaniac FrankTurk is talking about apologetics:
...the goal of apologetics ought to be not just giving an account for the hope which is within us, but it also should include something akin to making myself a servant to all, that I might win more of them, and becoming all things to all people, that by all means I might save some, all for the sake of the gospel, that I may share with them in its blessings. We should be about being a blessing to people, and not just about being the kind of blessing everyone needs but nobody wants to have over for dinner for fear of being berated...
More thinking on apologetics at Bethinking and Tom Price. We need apologists who love the gospel and love the church, the local church. That might look like serving the local church.

Comments

  1. I'd be interested to know how this might look in practice for a parachurch apologist/evangelist?

    I think that this idea of apologetics as merely defence needs to be properly brought to justice too. It is also about communication, accessible and popular level, where possible.

    I don't see a line between apologetics and evangelism either. I think that is where the false understanding of apologetics as merely defending the faith or merely tackling tricky questions comes from.

    Tom

    ReplyDelete
  2. A blog like this one, perhaps?

    http://church-of-my-dreams.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  3. i think parachurch is fine (naturally) so long as it's goal is to serve the church - Turk is talking about the kind of apologist/evangelist who is detatched from the local church entirely...

    apologetics/evangelism probably shouldn't be divided.. agreed with your concern with communication at an understandable level.

    you have the opportunity to be best practice.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Defence & communication, accessibility - that's why I love the book Questioning Evangelism. He calls it dialoguing the gospel, distinct from proclaiming (practically - know how to explain it, summarise it, give your testimony, etc.) and defending the gospel (practically - read up on composition of the canon, on the resurrection, etc.). But it becomes clear in reading it that this dialoguing the gospel actually is a line drawing evangelism & apologetics together like a drawstring, and isn't so much a distinct area as a means of practising both/it. I also kinda think it's in application of presup - y'know, all that questioning to get to the heart of things, but hey, I wouldn't want to start an apologetics name-calling war here...

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…