Skip to main content

Reasonable Faith Debate

Last night at the Westminster Central Hall, debate between William Lane Craig and Lewis Wolpert, chaired by John Humphreys on the question of : Is God a delusion?

Craig opened with his five arguments why God is not a delusion. These are found in expanded form in his booklet God, are you there? Wolpert replied, beginning with a sincere apology to all the theists in the room (probably 1800 out of 2000 at a guess...). He said he was sorry but we only believed because it made us feel better, conceding that we may have a happier and longer life... but such are the benefits of being stupid (which it seems we're supposed to believe we are). Ultimately Wolpert simply said that there was no evidence and kept asking who made God?

This was a bit disappointing because he didn't engage seriously with Craig's five arguments for God's existence, merely dismissing them. The two atheists sat in front of me really didn't like Craig's arguments. He played at a high intellectual level, constructing his premises and arguments clearly. Probably to some this came across as American arrogance in comparison with Wolpert's more British (though he's South African) self-deprecation and confessions of ignorance - which almost exposed him as an agnostic in the fire-side chat with John Humphreys at the end of the evening.

It felt like Wolpert either didn't want to play, or couldn't. Debates are more fun when they're a bit more close run. Still, there are more debates to come so perhaps they'll be more evenly matched. In the meantime, Craig showed that there are good reasons to believe in God - both philosophically, scientifically (which he was very keen to emphasise), theologically and experientially. In his final summary Craig made a warm and personal invitation for people to read the New Testament evidence about Jesus' resurrection. This didn't go down well with the two atheists in front of me "now he's preaching"... if that's what asking people to engage with evidence then perhaps we need more preaching!

Tom Price sums up how the Craig-Wolpert debate went down...
Cat went with the guys from Surrey CU
Paul was selling books
Matt reflects on some serious assertions
Jason wanted his money back

www.bethinking.org for more thinking Christianity.

Comments

  1. Hello thebluefish, do you remember me?

    I went to the WLC talk about suffering a few days ago and wrote up my experience and thoughts (http://robhu.livejournal.com/391160.html).

    I thought I might mention it in case you happened to be extremely bored (it is rather long after all).

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sure I remember u. I'll take a look.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…