Skip to main content

You mean God doesn't want some people to repent?

I've spent this afternoon rubbing my face in the Parable of the Word in Mark 4. And then I read this by Dan Phillips: Doomed Evangelism. Makes very helpful, if sobering reading. The Parable-Principle in action as Moses meets Pharaoh in Exodus 10.

When Paul writes about this doctrine in Romans 9, with his own people group in view, he writes with devastation and tear-stained face. We struggle with this doctrine because we don't like the idea of people not believing when we preach. But the weight of Biblical evidence seems to be that God is active both in hardening as well as in showing mercy, in both cases for his glory.

Comments

  1. I was just reading Jer 14-15 yesterday. I need to read it again because it was a little confusing, but it contains similar stuff. But I do wonder if it is maybe a bit more complicated than the Dan Phillips' of this world, or the typical Arminian/whatever on the street, make out. I wonder in particular what we mean by the word 'glory'.

    The answer usually comes back 'fame', and I think that is fairly true. But then the next question should surely be 'famous for what?' I am not sure of the answer, and Jer 14-16 seems to suggest that Jeremiah himself is with me in this.

    What do you think?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yeah agreed. The question is famous for what. In a long term sense, taking Romans 9-11 and the Exodus stuff into account part of that must be famous for being just not just merciful - i.e. if everyone got mercy then his justice would not be seen?

    In some sense I doubt we'll know til That Day how hardening glorifies God.

    We always go to proclaim Christ in hope of people believing and praying that it would happen... but we have to remember that Jesus word also hardens - that was the Isaiah 6 ministry, it was Jesus' parable ministry in Mark 4, and Paul saw the same in Acts 28...

    I suppose this reinforces our need to trust in the sovereignty of God when we wield his word... to trust with tears that God's best interests may be served even when people don't believe...

    (though: It would be all to easy to let ourselves use that as an excuse for not presenting the gospel as clearly, persuasively and winsomely as we might... - God's hardening of people is no excuse for poor proclamation)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Does it also make sense of Ezekiel 2 - where Ezzy's call seems to be about faithful proclamation rather than successful (in human terms) ministry. In fact, before he is even told what to say he is called to be faithful to the God who calls him to say it.

    I think this can be liberating for ministry - not, as you say Dave, that there is any place for sloppy ministry, but the encouragement of ministry is NOT in the results it produces (some, as you point out are downright depressing), but rather in our faithfulness to the one who calls us to it. Would we be less likely to give up on difficult ministry situations if we really believed this, I wonder?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hmm, it is a difficult question. For every answer I can think of, I can think of an argument against it. Perhaps it is because I am trying to reduce God to a set of attributes (justice, love, redeeming, ruling etc) . I remember listening to Carson once preach saying that 'holy' means 'separate' if anything but that if you really delve into its use in the bible you come back with 'God/God-like/God-derived'. Perhaps I have to stop thrashing around trying to find an answer and settle with God being famous for being who he is. You can't reduce a person to one sentence, why do I think we can do it to God. Not that this means we can say nothing about him (I think of your earlier post Dave), but we can't say God is ‘just’ (or ‘love’) and just leave it at that. Besides God is the one who shows us what love/justice is anyway.

    We can never perfectly align our living with God, and not just because of our sin. So I suppose what you are saying Dave is spot on - proclaim Christ (we know we should always do this, while stop praying for God's people either (like Jer) without trying to second guess God's secret will), and trust God.

    Adrian's so right in saying it is liberating. I remember coming back as an AM in Bristol for the life mission and it was so liberating to be part of a mission passionate about proclaiming Christ, but utterly trusting in God to do the work himself.

    The truth of Jesus' character is sweeter than any philosophising.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Big eyes full of wonder"

Books. Fiction. Libraries. Second only to churches as are the best gateways in your community to ultimate reality and new possibilities.

Our local library has just re-opened after refurbishment, and I love that our boys have spent several mornings there during the summer holidays, discovering some wonderful new stories.

I realised a few months back that I wasn't reading enough fiction. My work necessitates reading a lot of non-fiction, a mix of historical and contemporary thinking, biblical studies and theology. But fiction is the cinderella. Easily overlooked, and yet able to awaken my imagination and show me the way things are meant to be.

So I've picked up a few more lately - bought and borrowed. Not every book attempted flies, and that's ok. These have been winners though.

Ink. This is Alice Broadway's debut novel. It's young adult fiction and tells the story of Leora who lives in a world where the events of your life are tattooed on your skin. Nothing gets hid…

Uniquely Matthew

Reading gospel accounts in parallel is sometimes used to blur the differences in perspective between the evangelists, seeking to harmonise the texts and find a definitive historical account of what happened. No such thing exists because every account is biased and limited. You simply can't record everything. You have to hold a vantage point. And that's not a problem.

Matthew, Mark and Luke take a very different vantage point to John who was of course an eyewitness himself of the events. Comparing the text of Matthew, Mark and Luke across the death and resurrection of Jesus yields two steps.

Firstly, the common ground. All three accounts tell of...
Simon of Cyrene carrying the cross…. · Jesus labelled as King of the Jews…. · Criminals crucified with Jesus… · Darkness in the daytime… · Jesus' loud final cry… The women who witnessed Jesus death, and Jesus' burial… · The tomb lent to Jesus by Joseph of Arimithea… · The women who went to the tomb on the morning of the…

Songs we're singing in Church

Christians are a singing people, it's part of what we do when we gather.

Our church meets morning an evening on a Sunday - normally using 5 songs in each service. So, over the year that's about 520 song-slots available. The report from the database system we use (http://planningcenteronline.com/) tells us that in the past year we've sung about 150 different songs.

Our current most used song has been sung 11 times in the last year, just under once a month. Our top 10 are used about every 6 weeks. By #30 we're talking about songs used every two months. The tail is long and includes loads of classic hymns from across the centuries, plus other songs from the past 40 years, that we have used around once a term or less.

1. Rejoice - Dustin Kensrue



2. Come Praise & Glorify - Bob Kauflin



3. Man of Sorrows - Hillsong



4. Cornerstone - Hillsong


Rejoice was a song I didn't previously know, along with a couple of others that have quickly become firm favourites for me: Chri…